Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/jspui/handle/123456789/1056
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLangat, D.-
dc.contributor.authorCheboiwo, J.-
dc.contributor.authorOkoth, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKiprop, J.-
dc.contributor.authorKisiwa, A.-
dc.contributor.authorGuzha, A.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, N.-
dc.contributor.authorDeMeo, T.-
dc.contributor.authorGatama, S.-
dc.contributor.authorKerkering, J.-
dc.contributor.authorDoud, B.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T12:46:53Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-17T12:46:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://197.248.75.118:8282/jspui/handle/123456789/1056-
dc.description.abstractEcosystem services from Kenya’s forests have remained largely unmeasured and undervalued. Consequently, the benefits they provide are ignored in most forest management investment decisions.This has led to degradation and conversion of these forest ecosytems to alternative uses. This study was undertaken to value ecosystem services provided by the Mau, Cherangany hills and Mt. Elgon forest ecosystems. Primary data was collected from 1206 households and 148 forest product industry players using structured and semi- structured interviews. Secondary information was obtained from service providers, other published/ unpublished sources and from discussions with experts. Market prices, Contingent valuation, Cost-based and Benefit Transfer (BT) techniques were applied in estimating total economic values. Total Economic Value of the three ecosystems is about KES 339 billion (US$ 3.4 billion) per annum. Mau, Cherangany and Mt. Elgon ecosystems contributedKES 184 billion (US$ 1.84 billion), KES 42 billion (US$ 420million) and KES 115 billlion (US$1.15billion) respectively. In the three water towers, regulating services contributed the bulk of Total Economic Value (TEV) with 84% (Mau), 66% (Cherangany) and 93% 9Mt Kenya) underscoring the importance of indirect use values in forest ecosystems. Mau forest ecosystem had the highest regulation value of KES 162 billion followed by Mt. Elgon with KES 109 billion per annum and Cherangany at KES 30.6 billion per annum. Provisioning services contributed 10%, 23% and 4% of TEV for Mau, Cherangany and Mt. Elgon respectively. The TEV estimate from this study is very conservative because it did not encompass of all ecosystem service values. However, this study has provided vital that can assist conservation and management of the three water towers for enhanced livelihood and flow of ecosystem services.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipKEFRIen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKenya Forestry Research Institute / Center for International Forest Research / United States Forest Service –International Programsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesE. Afri. Agri. For.J (Pg 91 -100 Special Issue);(Pg 91 -100 Special Issue)-
dc.subjectForest,en_US
dc.subjecttotal economic value,en_US
dc.subjectecosystem services,en_US
dc.subjectcultural,en_US
dc.subjecteducational servicesen_US
dc.titleThe value of forest ecosystem services of Mau complex, Cherangany and Mt. Elgon, Kenyaen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.subject.ThematicAreafpien_US
dc.description.RegionalProgrammecherpen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.