Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/jspui/handle/123456789/764
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorADAIR, E . CAROL-
dc.contributor.authorWI L L IAM, J.-
dc.contributor.authorPARTON, S.-
dc.contributor.authorS T EVEN, J-
dc.contributor.authorGROSSO, DEL-
dc.contributor.authorS I LVER, WHENDEE L.-
dc.contributor.authorHARMON, MARK E.-
dc.contributor.authorHALL, SONIA A .-
dc.contributor.authorBURKE, INGRID C.-
dc.contributor.authorHART, S T EPHEN C.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-29T06:17:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-29T06:17:36Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486.2008.01674.x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/764-
dc.description.abstractAs atmospheric CO2 increases, ecosystem carbon sequestration will largely depend on how global changes in climate will alter the balance between net primary production and decomposition. The response of primary production to climatic change has been examined using well-validated mechanistic models, but the same is not true for decomposition, a primary source of atmospheric CO2. We used the Long-term Intersite Decomposition Experiment Team (LIDET) dataset and model-selection techniques to choose and parameterize a model that describes global patterns of litter decomposition. Mass loss was best represented by a three-pool negative exponential model, with a rapidly decomposing labile pool, an intermediate pool representing cellulose, and a recalcitrant pool. The initial litter lignin/nitrogen ratio defined the size of labile and intermediate pools. Lignin content determined the size of the recalcitrant pool. The decomposition rate of all pools was modified by climate, but the intermediate pool’s decomposition rate was also controlled by relative amounts of litter cellulose and lignin (indicative of ligninencrusted cellulose). The effect of climate on decomposition was best represented by a composite variable that multiplied a water-stress function by the Lloyd and Taylor variable Q10 temperature function. Although our model explained nearly 70% of the variation in LIDET data, we observed systematic deviations from model predictions. Below- and above ground material decomposed at notably different rates, depending on the decomposition stage. Decomposition in certain ecosystem-specific environmental conditions was not well represented by our model; this included roots in very wet and cold soils, and above ground litter in N-rich and arid sites. Despite these limitations, our model may still be extremely useful for global modeling efforts, because it accurately (R250.6804) described general patterns of long-term global decomposition for a wide array of litter types, using relatively minimal climatic and litter quality data.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Minnesota/Colorado State University/University of California/Northern Arizona Universityen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Change Biology;No. 14, 2636–2660-
dc.subjectcelluloseen_US
dc.subjectclimate decomposition indexen_US
dc.subjectfine rooten_US
dc.subjectleafen_US
dc.subjectlitter qualityen_US
dc.subjectQ10 functionen_US
dc.titleSimple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climatesen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
Appears in Collections:Carbon + Biomass Publications



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.